An enjoyable interview with Tamika Champion-Hampton, in which she shows her passion for reading and Christian life.
Category: Christian Living
-

From DOBE to BEDO
By Pat Badstibner, World Prayr, Inc.
This article has been updated as a response in the series Discussing the Law in Scripture. See that page for a detailed directory of articles in this discussion. The initial article in that discussion is The Law as Gospel.
There is something about having a mission statement for a mission that says, “Helping Christians act like Christians.” Such a mission statement creates mental images of Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible for me as I picture Tom Cruise jumping over motorcycles, walking down the side of a multi-story glass building, and other insanely impossible stunts. Yet, our minds are often so focused on Do that such a mission statement is the way we usually think.
This type of thinking once so predominately ruled my life that when faced with not being able to DO, I found myself standing on a bridge one night ready to jump, late one evening. An award-winning artist, my life was defined by being able to do DO. Now, I was facing not being able to be the man I once was. The very thing my identity and significance were found in I was faced with losing.
Dozens depended on my ability to perform for their livelihood and the ability to feed their families. As my church’s largest employer, I was also a leader among men known for his ability to help Christians act like Christians. This was who I was until diagnosed with a crippling disease. A disease that left me with an uncertain future, wondering why God was mad at me, and feeling like I would let dozens and my church down. Entering a world of silence with doctors predicting I may never be able to walk without some aid, much less DO again!
As I stood on that bridge, there were five prominent thoughts in my mind;
- I wanted to end the tremendous emotional and physical pain I was in.
- Was God mad at me?
- Hadn’t I done everything right?
- Why did it not seem enough? Why did I get the feeling that it wasn’t enough?
- Was God throwing me on the trash heap of life, was he done with me?
- How could I face anyone? What would they think of me now that I couldn’t DO?
My dear friend Henry said it best recently. “The devil is a gambler; he gambled on the jump. Grace won that night.”
I didn’t have the answers that night, and the pain of not knowing the answers to those questions was as painful as the physical pain I was feeling. Yet, looking back, it was not the bright lights that hit me in the face from the emergency road crew keeping me from jumping that night but God’s loving sovereignty. It was God’s loving sovereignty as he broke my self-righteousness, my idea of obedience, my self-sufficiency, and my idea of what a Christian should be to instill a different message. A message of hope and change.
One Without The Other Doesn’t Work
A message that focuses on both the gospel and the Law and reveals the necessity for both. Without a correct understanding of the Law, the gospel is not valid. Without the Law, we cannot express what we have discovered through the gospel in our life. Yet, the Law without the gospel is nothing more than a powerless to-do list unable to accomplish anything but make one weary from living life. I know firsthand about being tired from trying to be enough, to be right in the eyes of other Christians and God. My team and my family were indeed weary from my to-do lists and my insistence they perform to an unreachable standard.
I had grown up with a Christianity that was all about DO. That night on the bridge, tens of thousands of hours of study and what is now sixteen years later has brought a different message. A message that has created what my family calls Dadisms. “It isn’t if you don’t get the gospel right, you don’t get anything right. It is if you don’t get the Law right, you don’t get anything right, including the gospel.”
The Breakdown Begins
The first breakdown in getting the Law right occurs in the game “Whose Standard Is It?” Where contestants are left to themselves to set the standard of God’s Law. After deciding the standard, each contestant can then use their determination to judge themselves and others. As one can see in this game, the law’s standard becomes subjective to each contestant’s subjective judgment.
Creating a Law that now has a consistent change variable, a change determined by each player’s external circumstances and life experiences. When the standard of the Law is changed, we are left with no choice but to change God’s character. Instead of a God who acts independently, and perfectly we are left with a God defined by each player’s life experiences in the game. Here’s the catch though, all of us are playing the game.
The Game We All Know And Play
This is the game of life we all play. Once, we had no choice but to play this game, as we defined not only God but ourselves by our ability to play. Thus, it is the most natural thing to accept an ever-changing subjective law as we expect everyone and ourselves to hold to these standards. When we don’t, we live out of fear, we labor to control, suffer shame, loss of love, loss of connection, and we create divisions, even within ourselves.
When we change the standard of the Law from one objectively demanding utter perfection from us to one of being subjective, we also change the gospel. Instead of a gospel that tells us that we are all moral failures, and none of them are enough, we find a gospel that pushes us to be more, do more and do better. Instead of a gospel that tells us our answers lie elsewhere outside of us, its message now places us on a tireless hamster wheel. When we rob the Law of its objective demand of perfection and thus robbing of its voice so that it ceases to scream at us of its impossibility, we will quickly fall into that which is most natural to us.
We Must Let It Scream
It is natural to us to want to be right, to find sufficiency and rightness in ourselves. This leads one to Find One’s significance in being obedient and walking the right life. Only by trusting in a law that no longer defines God, His character, or His actions can we even begin to lay claim to finding significance in such a life. Only a Law that screams failure at us can break us of such a natural bent to find significance or reason to matter in what we do, rather than what Christ did.
Those who ignore the voice of the Law screaming failure at them find no reason to run continuously to the gospel (Gal 3:24-25) or explore its depth to a deeper level (Romans 8). For them, the gospel is a one-time done event. Such thinking, as previously noted, always leaves them imprisoned on the hamster wheel, running to be enough within themselves.
All You Need Is A Little More
As they labor to meet not only their expectations, everyone else’s but what they see as God’s as they run harder and harder to be more or prove themselves enough within their abilities. Only discovering, as John Paul Getty once remarked when asked how much money is enough, “just a little more.” Except now the question isn’t about how much money is enough, but “What more do I need to do?”
They may pretend that the law is not screaming at them or hear the law laughing at them running on the hamster wheel; they may even state such, as they remain caught up on the hamster wheel of performance and perfectionism. Yet as the law screams louder to the falsity of such claims, they run faster as they remain unwilling to walk into the light with one’s failures, weaknesses, and sins (1 John 1:5-10) with both God and man, hindering the fellowship of both.
The Struggle Is Real
Even sixteen years later, the idol of self pushes against what I know to be true about the gospel. As I labor with all of God’s elect to prove myself capable so that I might, I’m among those who are on the right side of Christianity—feeling the pangs of shame-driven guilt when I fall short of some imaginary standard. I find nothing that separates me from others as we labor in unison with a natural bent towards self-righteousness and self-sufficiency in our self-motivated efforts to be enough.
Those grace messages that do not call us to face our weaknesses or failures forget essential truths. Truths that remind us that there are two parts to the equation of “His grace is sufficient for my weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9).” The first part everyone seems to understand, but the second part of knowing one’s weakness either we or ignoring or unclear. Along with forgetting that grace is given to those who have heard the voice of the Law that they are not enough, nor will the most uprightness, the rightest person, the most together of us ever be enough alone (Psalm 138:6; Proverbs 3:34; Proverbs 29:23; Matthew 23:12; Luke 1:52; James 4:6; 1 Peter 5:5).
These messages attract like moths to light, not realizing that such light may endanger them. The following statement regarding society as a whole reflects this truth.
“Bolstering, maintaining, and protecting self-esteem is the sacred cow of modern society. It’s a grievous evil to do anything that might cause others to feel bad about themselves or their performance.” – Dan Rockwell.
The Message We Want Is Not The Need
Those who long ago downgraded the voice of the Law in such a way that it only gives them instructions on how to run better on the hamster wheel of life hunger and thirst to hear more of the words that tell them how to perform better, do more, be more pleasing and more worthy. As they scream out, “Give me instructions on how to improve, how to do better, then I can surely hold on to the hope that I’m improving.” “Tell me what to do,” their ego screams as it clamors for that which it falsely believes makes them significant, makes them enough, makes them matter.
Of course, it is not their ego they think they hear, but simply directions on proving themselves pleasing, they will say.
The longing for some form of righteousness is not an aberration perpetrated by capital-R Religion but a foundation of what it means to be human. – Seculosity: How Career, Parenting, Technology, Food, Politics, and Romance Became Our New Religion and What to Do About It. – David Zahl
Possibly never coming to understand that such behavioral, morality-based teaching only keeps hidden the real bread and water that will quench their hunger and thirst to be enough, to matter, to be counted significant (John 6:35). To their detriment, they have flocked to those teachers who have left them without knowledge, The knowledge that l rightness comes not from within themselves, but outside of them (Hosea 4). It is not instruction in how to do better, manage their behavior, perform better or do more they need first.
The Course They Need
It is a course on how to hear the bark of the Law daily as it robs one of all hope in improvement of oneself to be enough. Instruction in how to listen to the voice of the Law denies any attempt to find solace in thinking that God is quite satisfied, try-hard, do your best, or give it your best shot mentality. Anything short of such a course will leave them on the same tireless hamster wheel they’ve been stuck on.
Only such a course of instruction that leads them to grow less self-dependent and more dependent on the One who gave the ultimate performance enables them to change the questions that lead to new discoveries. Discoveries that point to the top performance that closed the application process for performers of the year. A performance that has now allowed all other performers to rest from the weariness of the hamster wheel (Matthew 11:28-30).
Change Always Requires Risk
Only when we take the risk to step off the hamster wheel of laboring to be special, significant, and made of the right stuff will our answers to the question of “Why Are We Significant” shift from; being about what we are doing and what others believe about us. When our lives are no longer based on making all the right calls, being right, or having it all together, only then will our focus shift away from ourselves to another apart from us. As our focus shifts, we discover life-changing beauty in the knowledge that because God has declared us His song of glory, the praise of His grace, His Crown Jewels, the reflection of the Trinity, and the beloved of the Son, we no longer need fear being exposed. Found out or seen as not having the right stuff.
These discoveries help us understand that when Christ said, “It Is Finished,” he told us we could stop working to be enough. And accept that He had now made us enough. Here is where we discover the beauty that we no longer must find within ourselves the ability to be right or enough to have a sense of our righteousness but accept that we have Christ’s (2Corinthians 5:21). Our failure to respond and live life from the knowledge of these truths leaves our focus inward. As our focus remains inward, we are left with no choice but to maintain the predominant determining factor of our identity, worth, value, and significance based on our ability to run.
The Real Battle
This is the war that rages in us and why we, like Paul, are coveters. It is why we long to hear those “to-do” messages and why we focus so hard on being right, winning, and being seen as enough. Why is this so?
It is what we lost in the garden. In the garden, we lost the knowledge that we were accepted, loved, and known. Since then, our curvature has been inward as we covet that which we deeply desire and turn to other lovers (Idols) to recover lost love. A curvature inward is always sin, as we focus on ourselves. The more we accept that we are deeply loved in Christ and are enough is when we will slowly experience our focus shifting away from us towards God and others.
The Real Beauty Of The Law
Then instead of the Law being a vessel of self-service to regain what we lost, it reveals the grace contained within as it gives us instruction in the art of love—teaching us to love the One who loved us first (1John 4:19) back and love others. We no longer have to change the Law for our purposes, but now can choose to outdo others in love (Matthew 22:35-40; Romans 12:9-21). Instead of laboring towards what we feel are our rights, entitled to or deserving, we now can choose sacrificial labor on behalf of others.
With the transformation of our minds, we move away from finding hope within ourselves to be right to ask, “How do I express that which I now am?” Creating a mind shift that moves us from DOBE to BEDO. Grow to realize that Colossians 1:10 is not an instruction on how to do more, but because we are more instruction on how to exhibit that we believe we are. Only as we give up any hope in a righteousness of our own, can we help others find the real source of righteousness, beginning with ourselves.
-
Energion Editor, Chris Eyre shares about depression

Sorrowing Old Man by Vincent Van Gogh
Energion Publications’ editor, Chris Eyre, gives us useful thoughts on depression, even if we are going through it right now, in his recent post, “The other side of despair.”
-
Response to "Prayer is Not Enough" Part 2
In the first part of my response to Steve Kindle’s article on the recent school shooting in Florida, I talked about some of the factors that make this issue so divisive and difficult even to the point that there is disagreement over the actual problem. Along those lines I would point out that since part one of my response we had another school shooting, this one in Maryland. However, rather than a large death toll, only two students were wounded before an armed officer was able to stop the shooter. This would argue against the concept of gun free zones.
Beyond the political questions, however, Steve raised some questions about prayer and God that I would like to address. The first is his claim that “Prayer is not enough.” Here I agree. It is vital and important, but it is not enough. 1 John 3:18 says, “Little children, we must stop expressing love merely by our words and manner of speech; we must love also in action and in truth.” We are to pray, but we must do more, we must act and what we do must actually be effective. Where our disagreement is, is over what actions would, or would not, be effective.
Steve had 3 “unanswered questions.” The third I addressed last time. Here are the first two.
1. If an angel could warn Joseph so Jesus could escape, why not have an angel kill Herod and let all escape? After all, an angel killed all the first-born sons of the pharaoh. Why not send an angel to kill all mass murderers? (Yes, I know, God works in mysterious ways.)
This is a good question, and in its various forms we could ask that of any number of situations. Ultimately it comes down to the problem of evil, i.e., why does God allow it, which is the most difficult question that Christians face. We believe in a loving and all-powerful God, so why does He allow evil? There is no completely satisfying answer. We can go a long way towards an answer by pointing to freewill, but even with freewill problems remain.
So again, I agree with Steve, at least to some extent that God works in mysterious ways. How could it be otherwise? To effectively judge the actions of another we must be in a position to understand the situation and alternatives as well or better than the one who made the decision. But how can we ever be in that position with an all-knowing God?
Say the angel had killed Herod and let all escape. God certainly could have done that, but then what? There are things that seem good to us in our limited understanding, that ultimately turn out to be horrible. Neville Chamberlain thought he was doing good by avoiding war. Now we know that what he really did was allow Hitler to grow in power to the point that a vastly larger and more destructive war was inevitable. He tried to do good, but ultimately made things worse.
Of course, one could argue, why doesn’t God send an angel to kill all the Herods and Hitlers, would that solve the problem? Perhaps, but then we would be focused on those still left, and the evil they did. After all, it is possible that the Herods and Hitlers are only the worst, because God did remove those who would have been even worse than they were. If, on the other hand, God were to remove anyone who does evil, there would be no one left.
We know that God allows freewill and thus evil. We also know that God has a plan. Ephesians 1:9-10 speaks of God’s “plan that he set forth in the Messiah to usher in the fullness of the times and to bring together in the Messiah all things in heaven and on earth.” How our freewill and God’s plan fit together is beyond our ability to understand, and least this side of eternity.
2. Why do so many of our urgent prayers go ignored? Pastors, think of all the times you prayed over spouses whose marriage was falling apart, to no avail; think of all the parents you prayed with whose child needed relief from drugs, crime, etc., to no avail; think of all the times you prayed for God to heal only to learn of continued chronic illness or death? Just to mention a few. (I know, God says, “No.”)
The answer to this question is strongly related to the first question. However, there is another factor here. To see this, turn the question around, what if every prayer was answered? Would that really be a good thing? Strange as it sounds Hollywood has dealt with this question in the movie Bruce Almighty. Have a problem with your spouse, just say a prayer and its fixed. Have a child in trouble, just say a prayer and its fixed. If you are sick, say a prayer and you are better.
Put this way the problems become clear. Should we raise our kids giving them what ever they asked for? Of course not, and neither does God. In fact, if it did work this way, God would be more the Great Vending Machine in the Sky serving us, rather than the God to whom we seek a relationship with.
So the question really is not why so few get answered (i.e, the way we want), but rather, why any get answered at all. They do because He is a merciful God.
Finally, Steve writes, “The doctrine of the Sovereignty of God, which refers to God being in complete control as he directs all things, has to go. Sure, you may tell me that God allows humans their free will and therefore accepts, consequently, innocent deaths. If, then, the survival or not of the people at Stoneman Douglas is finally left to chance, then prayer is not a factor at all.”
The problem with Steve’s statement is that is assumes God’s actions are all or nothing. We do not know what God did that day. What we know is that that He did not completely stop the killer and that 17-people died and 16 were injured. Maybe He did nothing. Maybe He did a lot and many more would have died, but for His intervention. We simply do not know. Nor can we know why those 17 and not others.
What I believe has to go, is not the Sovereignty of God, but the belief that we must be able to understand everything. As science has removed much of the mystery of nature, bringing it under the control of human understanding, the belief has developed that our understanding trumps everything. This is not really new. You can see it in all the various attempts to transform the nature of God into something we can understand, but now it has taken on a new importance.
In many respects, science and reason are the new ultimate, and everything must conform to our current scientific understanding or be discarded. This view has many problems, particularly given the increasing blurring of the lines between science and agendas. But the biggest problem is that this is in and of itself an irrational position when it comes to God. It is impossible for the finite to understand the infinite, and to demand that he infinite fit the finite, is irrational. So yes, God does work in mysterious ways.
One final comment; however right or wrong my understanding is here, I fully acknowledge the emptiness and futility of such explanations to those who are grieving. These are explanations of the head and completely ill suited to comfort the heart. Rabbi Harold Kushner, author of When Bad Things Happen to Good People, once said that when dealing with those who are grieving we should “show up and shut up.” To this I would add, and pray.
by Elgin Hushbeck, Jr., Engineer, teacher, Christian apologist, and author of Preserving Democracy, What is Wrong with Social Justice?, Christianity: The Basics, A Short Critique of Climate Change, Christianity and Secularism, and Evidence for the Bible.
[slideshow_deploy id=’2411′] -
Response to "Prayer is Not Enough"
Steve Kindle’s article on the recent school shooting in Florida raised some interesting questions and in the process demonstrated some problems that makes this issue so divisive. One of the issues that divides people is the very nature of the problem itself. Steve is clear in how he sees the problem when he writes, “The answer to our present difficulty—too many guns available for harm—lies in the Herod story,” which is a common view for those on the left, at least the too many guns part.
This is not just an issue with this problem, it is a division between how those on the Left and Right generally look at the world. Are problems to be found in people or in things. This might even explain why the left hates corporations, which they insist are not people, but love government which they see as the embodiment of people.
Those on the right, on the other hand, tend to see problems not with things, but in people. As one commentator put it, imagine three 19-year-old men with guns. One is hunting, one is on patrol in Afghanistan, one is entering a school with evil intent. There is only one problem here and it is the last 19-year-old with the gun, not the guns themselves.
Steve’s analogy equating Herod to guns does not really work. If you’re going to make an analogy, the 1st century parallel would not be Herod, but swords. Herod would then be the school shooter. Just as the problem in the first century was not the lack of sword control, but Herod, the problem with school shooting is not guns, but those with evil intent.
In the case of the most recent school shooting, it is increasingly becoming clear that the main problem, beyond the murderer, was not the gun, but the virtually complete and systematic failure of multiple levels of government to react to the numerous red flags. Why so many levels of government failed is still unknown.
Yet rather than focus on that failing Kindle writes “The students and faculty of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School show us the way.” But which students? Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School is a very large school with a diverse range of opinions. But the left has picked out those that agree with their agenda and presents them as if they were the only students.
To make matters worse, they demonize those who disagree, particularly focusing on the NRA. I do believe there are things we could do to make schools safer, but to do so will take laws, and laws take persuasion and compromise, and that takes trust. This is something both sides seem to have forgotten. Currently, neither side has much trust of the other. Demonizing your opponent is hardly a way to build trust.
Nor is some the rhetoric from the right. Not everyone who wants to tighten up gun laws wants to confiscate all guns. On the other hand, putting words like “common sense” in front of “gun laws” does not make it so. Take for example the often-heard call to ban “assault rifles.” However reasonable that may sound, the problem is that “assault rifle” is an extremely difficult, if not impossible, term to define and ultimately means little more than “a gun I do not like.”
Nothing shows the split between the two sides more than the proposal to allow some trained personnel to carry concealed weapons at school. To many on the right it is a completely reasonable proposal to consider as they do not see the problem as an inanimate object, i.e., the gun, but the person with evil intent, i.e., the murderer.
Mass shootings end when someone else with a gun shows up to stop the murderer. In a few instances, there have been people already on site with a concealed weapon who were able to stop the murderer quickly, vastly reducing the death toll, but in places were guns are banned, such as schools, you have to wait for the police to arrive and that can take critical minutes, during which many lives are lost.
Thus, why not have a few trained personnel already on site? In fact, many on the right suspect that one of the reasons these murderers choose gun free zones is that they are confident there will be no one there to stop them. Having even the possibility that there may be someone with a concealed weapon on site may have a deterrent effect. Yet for many on the left who see guns as the problem, having guns in schools is horrifying.
Steve’s third “unanswered question” (I will deal with the other two in my next article) was, “Why does ‘the right to bear arms’ trump the right to live without fear of being murdered by one?” While there are several ways this could be answered, the most obvious reason is that we are a nation of laws and the former is in the Constitution and the latter is not. One could of course propose an amendment to change or repeal that right, but it is highly unlikely it would pass.
Going forward, I take it as a given that we will not confiscate all guns. Even if the 2nd amendment were legitimately changed through the amendment process, or illegitimately changed by a court ruling, there are simply too many people who own guns to allow this to happen in the foreseeable future. But again, the desire to get rid of guns shows the focus on things.
If a person desires to do evil they will find a way. After all, the deadliest school massacre in the United States was not one of the recent school shootings, but the bombing of a school in 1927. 2014’s attack in Kunming China using knifes left 31 dead and 140 others injured. Removing guns, even if it was a realistic option, would only shift the problem, not remove it. Given the information available on the internet, those seeking to do evil may be led to even deadlier options.
In terms of the overall debate, there is nothing really new about our current situation, other than the percentages. There have always been those on both sides who will seek to build trust and work together, and those who seek to demonize and defeat. This is nothing new. What has changed is that the percentages have changed such that those who demonize are currently dominant, and here again there is fault to be had on both sides. The solution is not to be found in focusing on those that can easily be condemn. Rather it will be found in the more difficult task of seeking out those who are willing to discuss the differences so as to begin building some trust.
For there to be “common sense” gun laws, there must first be common ground upon which to build a consensus. That will take open and honest discussion and debate. It does not mean ignoring our differences but discussing them seeking a common ground upon which a consensus can be built. It means learning to understand the other side, rather than just characterizing them into a convenient strawman to be attacked or rejected. Doing this over time will build a level of trust that could lead to a consensus that might lead to actually doing something constructive.
by Elgin Hushbeck, Jr., Engineer, teacher, Christian apologist, and author of Preserving Democracy, What is Wrong with Social Justice?, Christianity: The Basics, A Short Critique of Climate Change, Christianity and Secularism, and Evidence for the Bible.
[slideshow_deploy id=’2411′] -
People Are the Wreath of Victory
(From Dave Black Online, Sunday, February 25, 2018)
3:36 PM Hey, here’s something to think about from 1 Thess. 2:17-20 (our passage for this week in Greek 4). The word usually translated as “crown” is a metaphor drawn from the Greek athletic contests.
It “alludes to the wreath which was awarded to the victor in an athletic contest: victory in such a contest afforded the victor and all associated with him ample grounds for … (‘boasting’)” (Bruce, p. 56).
Paul “looks forward to the occasion of final review and reward, when he will present his converts to the Lord who commissioned him, as evidence of the manner in which he has discharged his commission.”
Have you ever thought of the people you influenced for Christ as a “wreath of victory” in whom you could rejoice? It’s astonishing to me that Paul actually considered people as his reward. He’s so utterly identified with his converts that he calls them his glory. I can well imagine Rudy Ulrich sitting in heaven wearing the wreath of Dave Black, whom he led to the Savior in 1960. We are the body of Christ. God uses us to reach others with His love. The good news is that He uses us in spite of ourselves. Truth is, there are some people who will never hear about Jesus unless I tell them. All that we touch, everything we bump up against in our lives, is to be offered to Him for the work of salvation. God calls us, pleads with us, to be involved. Our world is starved to see Christ’s love modeled somewhere. All we need is a willingness for whatever. Paul was always moving “with hands outstretched to whatever lies ahead” (phil. 3:14). But he did that with open hands — a total stripping from all this world has to offer. The Thessalonian believers were living proof that Paul had done just that. May God show us every thread of self that still needs stripping away.
[slideshow_deploy id=’2299′]
-
Relationships of Grace: Responding to Shauna Hyde's “Fifty Shades of Grace”
“This book [Fifty Shades of Grace] has been written to honor all people, male and female, who have been mistreated, overlooked, and unloved,” so writes Shauna Hyde as she seeks to provide a holistic approach to the healing of relationships.
Scripture proclaims that humans are not meant to be alone. We need one another to find wholeness. We need institutions like the church to nurture our spiritual adventures. Yet, life is messy, and relationships and institutions, like the church, are messy, too. The response, “it’s complicated” relates to virtually all of our lives and relationships. Sometimes the messiness and complication of life lead to abusive relationships, in which wounded people wound others by word and deed. While we are created in original wholeness, brokenness and sin touch every aspect of our lives, bringing pain where joy should be the primary reality. Sometimes even the church, intended to be God’s instrument of healing and wholeness, becomes an instrument of relational abuse when victims are blamed and persons are counseled to stay in abusive relationships or forgive others prematurely. The church can be an agent of spiritual abuse by shaming, creating unnecessary guilt, and using scripture as a tool of violence rather than an agent of healing.
Shauna Hyde invites us to seek relationships of grace, in which our wounds are healed and we can give and receive healthy love. As the imperfect children of imperfect parents, living in the midst of imperfect institutions, this task is often quite difficult. Yet, Jesus came that we might have life in all its abundance, and that means relationships of abundant affection and reciprocity. Such relationships emerge when couples and communities make a commitment to empathy and equality, and promote maximal freedom, creativity, and affirmation in their approach to relationships. Very much like our discoveries and then healing of ethnic privilege, this process involves paying attention to our behavior, noticing the impact of the past on the present, positively and negatively and our willingness to attend to our emotional and spiritual lives, recognizing our limitations, and challenging our own and others’ behaviors. Because of the power of the past, such transformation is as much a gift of grace as the result of our individual or corporate effort.
As we move toward the Lenten season, we would do well to ask God to “create in us a clean heart and renew in us a right spirit.” (Psalm 51:10) We no longer need to be conformed to unhealthy behaviors and institutional abusiveness, we can be transformed by opening to divine renewal. (Romans 12:2) With God’s grace, we can let go of the past, affirm our value as God’s children, and insist that our own and others’ dignity be respected in every relationship.
by Bruce G. Epperly, author of over 45 books and a number of Energion Publications’ titles, including Angels, Mysteries, and Miracles, Process Theology: Embracing Adventure with God and Process Spirituality: Practicing Holy Adventure He is also the author of various Energion scripture studies including, Experiencing God in Suffering and Jonah: When God Changes as well as Angels, Mysteries and Miracles: A Progressive Vision.
-
Making Process Theology Make Sense
George Bernard Shaw once noted that the professions are conspiracies against the laity. We see this dynamic often when we visit our physician or attempt to have a conversation with an attorney. Many of us are baffled by the vocabularies of our automobile mechanics and computer technicians as well. That certainly is the case for the relationship of theologians to laity. Complicated and often undefined words, and complex doctrinal formulae, baffle laypeople, leading to the assumption that theology is utterly irrelevant to their lives and that theologians have little or no concern, or worse yet, value to issues in the “real” world.
Sadly, the gap between theologians and laypersons is also evident the work of many process theologians. While there is a place for academic theology and the linguistic richness of Whitehead’s thought, many process theologians’ desire to be true to the insights and language of Alfred North Whitehead often renders process theology incomprehensible, even to congregants who hold advanced degrees. A friend of mine tells the story of her pastor, who preaches an explicit sermon on a theme in process theology once a year. His congregants greet him in the receiving line after worship with the words, “interesting sermon” or “that was profound” and then remark to one another in the parking lot, “Did you understand anything he said? It was way over my head!”
When I tell my congregants, as I regularly do, “You’re a theologian,” they shake their heads and respond, “Not me. I’m no theologian.” To which I reply, “Anyone who thinks about matters of life and death, about the meaning of life, and their personal calling is a theologian.” Accordingly, good theology must address people where they live and work, responding to their hopes and dreams, their individual aspirations and political ideas. While often the term “practical theology” is used, like most adjectival terms, as a diminutive compared to the “real” theologians, that is, systematic theologians, the most meaningful theological reflection is profoundly practical. Theology, at its best and most profound, should emerge from and then illuminate our everyday experiences of hope and fear, meaning and doubt, aging and adventure, living and dying.
I have been fortunate to be bi-vocational most of my professional life. For nearly forty years, I have walked the halls of ivy as a seminary, medical school, graduate school, and undergraduate professor. I have spent virtually all those years as a pastor at the congregational and university levels. I have gone straight from the classroom and my keyboard to the hospital, a funeral, or a counseling session. I have taught theology in every congregational venue, and my pastoral experiences have shaped my theological reflections. I have lived my theology – especially process theology – in dealing with issues of life and death of body, mind, and spirit; community involvement; congregational and institutional budget priorities.; and guidance on issues of values and meaning in personal and professional life.
I have lived the process vision’s focus on possibility, relationality, creativity, and freedom in my personal and professional life, believing it to be a faithful description of what it means to follow the way of Jesus in our time. In the process, I have coined the term “theospirituality” to describe the intimate relationship of theology and spirituality, Spiritual experiences are the wellspring of theological reflection. Without the encounter with God, there would be no theology. Conversely, theological reflection serves as a means of understanding our mystical and life-changing experiences and describing them in ways that are both healthy and congruent with reality as we know it.
My anticipated five-part series on process theology with Energion Publications is an attempt to make process theology come alive for laypersons as well as pastors and spiritual leaders. Beyond the current, Process Theology: Embracing Adventure with God and Process Spirituality: Practicing Holy Adventure, I envisage at least three more volumes related, respectively, to ministry, politics, and bioethics. In the first two books and the projected series as a whole, I have sought to join academic rigor, that is, faithfulness to the insights of process theology, with a commitment to communication and transformation across a broad spectrum of lay and professional preparation. I believe theology touches the heart and hands as well as the head, and theology that emerges from experience can be expressed in ways that interested laypersons and pastors can understand and communicate as well.
In some sectors, reflection on a theological treatise leads to the question, “Will it preach?” While not all theological reflection needs to address lay and pastoral concerns, eventually good theology is embodied in accessible teaching and preaching.
I believe that you can “live” process theology. You can embrace the dynamic, interdependent nature of life; the vision of a relational God who calls you to be a partner in healing the earth; and you can live ecological values in relationship to the non-human world. I believe that in this daily embodiment, mind, body, spirit, and relationships are integrated in a way that brings joy to us and joy to the world.
Bruce G. Epperly is the author of over 45 books, including Process Theology: Embracing Adventure with God and Process Spirituality: Practicing Holy Adventure. He is also the author of various Energion Scripture studies including, Finding God in Suffering: A Journey with Job and Jonah: When God Changes as well as Angels, Mysteries and Miracles: A Progressive Vision.
[slideshow_deploy id=’2461′]






