Category: Marriage and Family

  • William Powell Tuck: The Importance of Moral Living

    William Powell Tuck: The Importance of Moral Living

    by Dr. William Powell Tuck, friarsfragment.com, retired pastor, professor and author of The Forgotten Beatitude: Worshiping Through Stewardship, A Positive Word for Christian Lamenting: Funeral Homilies, The Church Under the Cross, and more!

    In a recent Gallup Poll, it was noted that 80 per cent of persons in the United States said that moral ratings were at the lowest point in seven years. What does that say about the state of our country now? I believe that a part of the origin of our problem in morality is the belief in absolute freedom. Absolute freedom is a myth because no one can do anything that he or she may want to do at any moment without regard for other people. My actions and your actions involve others, and we are never totally isolated in what we say or do in any particular moment. Rules do have importance in life. Persons are, of course, more important than rules. Jesus indicated that persons were more important than regulations about the Sabbath Day. Persons were more important than the rigid legalism of the Jewish system that focused on minor details of the law. But Jesus did give us some principles about life in the Sermon on the Mount and in his other teachings. His teachings offer guidance on how we are to think about ourselves and how to relate to others in society. To say that there are no rules by which a Christian, a Jew, a Muslim, or an unbeliever lives, and that each is free to make up his or her own rules, is, in my opinion, to misrepresent that person’s faith or tradition. The Ten Commandments are still valid as basic guidelines for living. As a Christian, I seek to follow Christ and to incorporate the principles of his life and teachings into my own life, and I think persons of other faith traditions need to do the same with their teachings.

    A father of twelve children who lived in a house with only one bathroom, once said: ”Rules are not an option here. They are a necessity!” And so are moral principles. When we try to live in the world, rules are not just optional, they are essential. This is true not only in individual relationships but most especially when we move to the wider dimension of society at large. What I do privately not only affects me, but it also touches other people. In society, I may live a private moral life but my morality must also move over into the business world where I work, and in the industrial and financial world in which I am involved. “He who claims he doesn’t need anyone is either ignorant or a liar,” Michel Quoist writes, “because he lives thanks to other people who have engendered life since the beginning of time. If he refuses to live for others, he is a parasite. He grows by feeding off his brothers.”

    Over eighty years ago Reinhold Niebuhr, one of the great moral theologians of the last century, wrote a book entitled Moral Man and Immoral Society. In this book, he addressed the issue of morality in one’s private life and the difference in morality in our business, industrial, national, and other collective areas. Persons can often do very immoral things in the collective areas of life and never see how that is immoral. Niebuhr’s challenge echoes the biblical demand that morality is an absolute necessity in our business practice and in all our public as well as private relations with people. Morality is not limited to one’s private life, as important as that is, but moral values should permeate our relationships in business, industry, government, and other collective institutions. Walter Rauschenbusch has reminded us that “sin is not a private transaction between the sinner and God.” “Humanity always crowds the audience-room when God holds court,” he declares. Amos had cried for justice in the land of Israel, “seek good and not evil … Hate evil and love good; enthrone justice in the courts” (Amos 5:14-15, NEB).

    Morality is not merely what one thinks is correct in the moment. Too many people depend on their conscience alone. They assume that if one thinks it is the decent thing to do that will make it okay. They declare that they will let conscience be the guide. I am sometimes very troubled by some people who want to follow their conscience, because their conscience does not seem strong enough morally to give them the kind of guidance which they need for a valid decision. When decency has no spiritual rootage, I believe, it is based primarily on what some individual thinks is right or wrong. I am very frightened of those who want to let their conscience be their primary guide. Some people have too easily and quickly let their conscience become twisted and distorted by all kinds of negative influences upon it.

    I have often wondered if we would do certain things, if we would give it the publicity test. How would you like for certain acts or deeds which you have done to be reported in the local newspaper, or on the local television, or Facebook or to be reported in the paper of your church, or synagogue or in the community? None of us may want some dark deeds done in the shadows to be put into the public eye. But one of the tests for our morality might be, “Can it stand the test of daylight and exposure in the public arena? Can it stand the public test of those around me–my friends, and others? Do I want private acts to be known in public circles? “You won’t even achieve enduring external success,” David Brooks attests, “unless you build a solid moral code.”

    Some politicians have later gotten into great difficulty because of indiscrete acts they engaged in earlier in life. So, you and I should seek to live in such a way that our lives are not destroyed later by the acts we may do in the darkness or in times of weakness. Learn to let the test of publicity remind us that our moral lives are evidence that we have been challenged to live morally in the light or dark places of our lives.

    I heard about a woman who had lost her sense of touch. She could place her hand on a hot stove and be burned badly because she could not feel it. Her hand could be literally frozen to a block of ice because she could not feel the pain. A pin could be stuck in her hand and she could not feel it. That is a great tragedy and danger. What an even greater tragedy it would be for those of us who are supposed to be children of God, if we lose our sense of feeling for what is right and wrong. Injustice, immorality, and unethical behavior are too much evident in our land and around the world. We are challenged not only to do what is right and moral ourselves, but we must seek to see that justice and righteousness is directed and administered for all persons regardless of their race, sex or sexual preference, religion, creed, political alliance, economic status, belief, or non-belief.

    Featured image by Sasin Tipchai from Pixabay

  • Speaking to Your Grandchildren about God

    by Bruce Epperly

    Grandson cover“We’re going to Gabby’s church!” my grandson announces as we’re pulling out of the driveway to run errands. On the way, I tell him that we’re going to see my administrative assistant for a few minutes before going to the library across the parking lot. My four year old grandson asks, “Is she your boss?” and I correct him with “No, I’m the boss.” To which he responds, “You’re wrong, Gabby. God and Jesus are your bosses!”
    Children have a sense of the holy. They live in the magic world of the imagination and the joy of the senses. They experience both the awe and terror of life. They know that they are dependent and they are trying to make sense of the chaos of the world into which they are born.
    Grandparents have a role in helping their grandchildren make sense of the world. We provide a sense of safety and order, and we also encourage creativity and novelty. Our grandchildren know that they are loved unconditionally, without some of the pressures that come with parenting. Grandparenting is often easier than parenting, because of its gracefulness. We don’t have to prove ourselves. We know that we’ll make mistakes but we also know that our children survived our parenting, and grew up to be parents themselves!
    Children ask questions – about everything! My oldest grandchild loves sharks. He knows that sharks are predators and can be dangerous. He likes their fierceness. They help him feel brave, especially when he’s pretending to be a shark. But, being fierce often leads to discipline by his parents and occasionally his grandparents. One day, he asked me, “Does God love sharks?” You see, he already knows a lot about theology. He knows, based on our conversations, that “God is bigger than infinity.” He knows, based on other conversations, that “God and Jesus live forever and are in charge of things” even though we have freedom. He knows that his recently deceased great-grandmother is with God in heaven and that love never ends. So the question, “Does God love sharks?” is a perfect one.
    I responded to his query, “What do you think? Do you think God loves sharks?” And, his reply was “yes.” I returned with “God loves sharks and God loves you, too!”
    Talking with your grandchildren about God is more about creating a space for conversation than preaching to them.   Young children aren’t able to deal with abstractions, so doctrine is of little consequence and some so-called orthodox doctrines – such as hell, divine punishment, sin – can be harmful to children’s faith if shared in a literal, absolutist fashion. A young child who hears about the fate of sinners can worry that he or she will spend forever apart from their parents in a dark and fiery place. A young child who is told to change because he or she is “different” than others can spend a lifetime in shame and guilt for something unworthy of censure.
    Our task is to listen and not correct when spiritual issues come up. Our orthodoxies are too small to be taken literally in a 14 billion year, 125 billion galaxy universe. Don’t worry about the age of the earth; take your grandchildren out at night to revel in a starry night, show them a geode, or go hiking in the woods. Let their own curiosity drive your faith conversations.
    Jesus said, “Let the children come to me.” He saw the child as an embodiment of the realm of God. Our talking is grounded in our listening. Let the children in your life shine. Watch them, observe their delight and fear, and let that be your guide. What our children need most is for us to “let our lives speak.” To share words of love and descriptions of divinity, but more importantly embody divine love in relating with them. Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel spoke of “radical amazement” as one of the most significant religious virtues. Our sustained wonder and amazement is our best gift to our children, along with our love. In a world that tamps down amazement, we need to help them stay in touch with beauty, wonder, love, and the surprising world in which we live.
    We grandparents are the “elders.” Let us pass along our faith, and more importantly our love and wonder to bring delight, beauty, and integrity to generations in the making.
    Bruce Epperly is Pastor of South Congregational Church, United Church of Christ, Centerville, MA. He regularly teaches courses in spirituality, ministerial excellence, and theology for seminaries and gives seminars and lectures on healing, spirituality, process theology, and ministerial self-care and excellence. He is the author of 35 books, including a number of Energion books, “Letters to My Grandson,” “Process Theology: Embracing Adventure with God,” “Experiencing God in Suffering: A Journey with Job,” and “Holistic Spirituality: Life Giving Wisdom from the Book of James.” He has written texts on Philippians and Galatians for the Energion Participatory Bible Study Series.


  • Law and Grace

    by H. Van Dyke Parunak

    CoverAbout the time that my book Except for Fornication (Energion, 2011) appeared, a gentleman with a troubled marital history visited our assembly. His wife had left him and married someone else. Then she left her new husband, and our friend joyfully announced one day that she wanted him to remarry her.
    If you’ve read my book, you’ll realize that the Lord’s prohibition of divorce and remarriage strongly affirms Moses’ instruction in Deut. 24:1-4. You’ll also understand that Moses is not presenting three laws in this passage, but just one: if a divorce takes place and if it is followed by remarriage, and if something happens to the second marriage, then the original couple is forbidden to remarry. Moses characterizes such remarriage as “abomination before the Lord.” I felt compelled to share this insight with our friend.
    His response was interesting. He didn’t challenge my analysis of Deuteronomy 24. He didn’t question my claim that the Lord’s teaching is based on that instruction, and reinforces it. His defense was, “I’m not under the law; I’m under grace.” What he meant is that the commands of Scripture are irrelevant to the daily life of a believer. He felt that the work of the Holy Spirit replaces the role of God’s written revelation, so that we are not bound by the old standards.
    Wow! I am certainly acquainted with the distinction that Paul draws between the letter (that is, the OT law) and the Spirit. I recognize the role of the Spirit in guiding the believer. But I’d never met somebody who was willing to jettison the authority of Scripture so directly. I should add that my friend would insist on the truth of the propositional content of the Bible. The point of disagreement was the third of Moses’ principles from Deut. 29:29, that God’s word is practical in the life of the believer today.
    Now, most of you would probably not agree with my friend’s bald rejection of God’s written commands. But one consequence of my analysis in the book is that the fornication “exception” isn’t really an exception. It doesn’t give Christians the excuse that many are seeking to get out of a painful relation. Faced with such a stringent instruction, some may be tempted to fall back on my friend’s logic in an attempt to evade our Lord’s plain teaching that marriage is permanent.
    I was so exercised by this discussion that I undertook a study on the role of the law in the Christian’s life. You can read it at http://www.cyber-chapel.org/LawAndTheChristianLife.pdf. I’ll summarize for you what I found.
    Recall from our discussion of intertextuality the Scriptural principle that new revelation is accepted only if it conforms to what has already been revealed. The Bible describes God’s righteous standard as everlasting:
    Ps. 119:142 Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and thy law is the truth.
    The standards of right and wrong have not changed over the years. Behavior that was abomination before God in the Old Testament is still abomination before him now. What has changed is how God conforms our lives to his standard. Under the old covenant, the constraint was external, the law of God enforced through a civil structure. Under the new covenant, those same righteous standards are embedded in our hearts by the work of the Spirit (Jer 31:31-34; Ezek 36:25-27).
    But that process of embedding takes time. It begins with a new birth, which yields a person that Paul calls a “babe in Christ” (1 Cor 3:1-3). The life of such a person looks like that of an unsaved person: ye … walk as men (1 Cor 3:3). At the other extreme is the spiritual believer, whose life is beyond reproach (1 Cor 2:15). John refines these two extremes into three levels of maturity: little children, young men, and fathers (1 John 2:12-14).
    This process of growth is nourished by the Word of God (1 Pet. 2:2), which includes the OT law. As young believers, we have not learned to recognize the Spirit’s guiding voice, and need the explicit instruction of Scripture. So it’s no surprise that when Paul is exhorting immature believers, he frequently gives lists of commands that sound a lot like the Old Testament law (Gal. 5:19-21; 1 Cor. 6:9-10; Eph. 5:3-5), and sometimes even quotes the law for support (Eph. 6:28-31; 6:1-3; 1 Cor. 9:8-11). As we mature, the Spirit’s voice becomes clearer, and we know what is right and wrong without needing to cite chapter and verse. But the standard itself hasn’t changed, and God’s Spirit will never disagree with God’s Word. In fact, we are to test the spiritual voices we hear by their agreement with written revelation (1 John 4:1-3).
    We dare not discard the law of God. Romans 7, which describes a carnal believer (v. 14), shows that we should delight in the law of God (v. 22), even though we are frustrated with how far our lives differ from it (v. 24). The solution is not to discard the law, but (as Romans 8 goes on to show) to learn to recognize and follow the voice of the Holy Spirit, “that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit” (8:4).


    To order Except for Fornication, click here:
    https://energiondirect.info/biblical-studies/except-for-fornication

     
     

  • Charting a multi-faith course

    by Robert R. LaRochelle

    What advice would you offer to couples who are in interreligious situations? What might be some ways of navigating through these differences successfully?

    CrossingIn A Home United, I offer several suggestions for dealing with this reality. I would love to read what you have to say. In addition, if anyone has concrete, real life experiences you would like to share, I would really encourage you to post them.
    I need to say, however, that ‘interreligious situations’ covers a multitude of possibilities. One might mean Christian-Jewish, Catholic-Protestant, believer-agnostic or atheist, Buddhist-Muslim, Jewish-Hindu, or a good number of other possibilities. I would be very interested in having us share personal experiences or comment on what we have learned in real life pastoral situations.
    By way of self-disclosure, as I say in this book and in Crossing the Street (Energion), I am a Protestant clergyperson and I am married to a Roman Catholic. In Crossing the Street, I detail a lot of my journey. This journey includes the movement in my own life from active ordained Roman Catholic to Protestantism. In A Home United, I touch upon these questions I ask here. I believe sharing from your personal experience can really enliven this conversation and I look forward to reading and commenting upon what you have to say!!


  • Is love enough for any marriage?

    by Robert R. LaRochelle

     Home UnitedHow important is it to discuss the subject of religion BEFORE you are married? In what ways might religious matters become issues over the course of a marriage?
    There are many topics couples looking at a commitment to one another need to discuss. Among them would be: possible children, finances, each other’s personality, relationships with families of origin…and many more. In my book, A Home United: Strategies for Couples with Different Beliefs, I argue that couples need to put religious issues on the table for discussion. What do you think?
    The viewpoint I espouse is a basic one: I would answer my own question by saying that it is potentially dangerous for the relationship if these issues go unaddressed.
    How about having a discussion about this right here in this space?


     Here’s a link to Bob’s Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/ahomeunited

  • Can mixed-faith marriages succeed?

    by Robert R.  LaRochelle

    Home UnitedRecent statistics show that about 40% of all married individuals marry someone who comes from different religious backgrounds from their own. In addition, it appears that around 22 % of Americans are ‘ nones’, i.e. people without religious affiliation.
    I’m often asked, “Do these religious differences pose potential problems that may arise within a marriage? And, might there be a positive side to these realities?”
    My recent book, A Home United: Strategies for Couples with Different Beliefs, is based on the simple fact that the above numbers cited represent basic facts. The book is intended to encourage serious conversation between individuals contemplating marriage, preparing for marriage and those who are married. In the book, I look at the strengths and weaknesses of these inter-religious relationships.
    It is my conviction that problems could occur in these relationships if they are not addressed honestly and openly. In this book, I offer particular, specific questions and encourage couples to discuss them. In addition, I suggest these questions as resources for those who work to prepare couples for marriage. I also think these questions will be helpful to those already married who may very much need to address the issues discussed in this book.
    I would appreciate it if YOU would post your response to the questions I list above. By the way, in the book I make clear that when I am discussing married or engaged couples, I am being inclusive, i.e., I am commenting on same sex and heterosexual couples.


Energion Direct
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.