In a polarized world where name-calling and accusations split the country into various factions, it is incredibly tempting to think that anyone who disagrees with you is simply uninformed or fundamentally flawed.

While it is easy to assume that those with opposing views are ignorant or ill-intentioned, Elgin L. Hushbeck, Jr. argues in You’re Probably Wrong (And So Am I) that the reality is far more complex. Disagreements are often not about one side being “right” and the other “wrong,” but rather stem from our inherent lack of perfect knowledge and the different ways we process information. By recognizing that our personal views are often an amalgam of facts, opinions, and ingrained errors, we can move past the assumption of deficiency in others and begin to understand the true roots of our social discord.

Many political disputes are actually clashes over definitions and foundational values rather than simple facts. For instance, a debate over “tax burden” might reveal that both sides are factually correct, yet they are using entirely different definitions of what a tax entails. Furthermore, the book explores how the fundamental political divide is often a delicate balancing act between the mutually exclusive values of liberty and equality. Because an increase in one often requires a decrease in the other, intelligent and compassionate people will naturally reach different conclusions based on which value they prioritize.

Hushbeck further clarifies the political landscape by tracing our modern labels back to the competing ideals of the French and American Revolutions. He demonstrates that the conventional political spectrum is often nonsensical, particularly in its placement of Fascism on the far right. By revealing that Fascism actually originated as a left-wing rejection of individual liberty in favor of total state control, the book explains why labels like “Communist,” “Fascist,” and “Anarchist” are almost always historically inaccurate and toxic to genuine discourse. Instead, he proposes a clearer framework that separates democratic debates over government size from the authoritarian spectrum of absolute control.

The only way to resolve these deep-seated disagreements is through honest, open discussion that seeks to clarify definitions and uncover underlying foundations. Pick up your copy of You’re Probably Wrong (And So Am I) today to move beyond the name-calling and start practicing the principles of effective dialogue. By learning to tolerate opposing views and prioritizing truth over partisan bickering, we can finally move toward a better understanding of one another and the complex world we share.

individualism vs. collectivism

You’re Probably Wrong (And So Am I)