Tag: communication

  • From SAD to GLAD

    by David Moffett-Moore

     
    [ene_ptp]We live in a time of unparalleled, immeasurable, and uncontrollable change. The cell phone in our pocket is more powerful than all the computers used for our lunar landing, and that cell phone is obsolete before we can buy it. Everything is changing, and the change is happening at an ever increasing speed.
    This change affects every congregation. Phyllis Tickle sees the church in the midst of a change it has not seen for five hundred years. Phillip Jenkins describes it as a change we’ve not seen for a thousand years. This is a scale that is beyond our imagination. We live for a span of seventy-five years; how can we relate to a change measured by centuries? It is not just a storm of change, it is a tsunami of change, a change that is an earthquake and a tidal wave combined. It is over powering.
    Change, even when it is good, desired, and controlled, produces stress, and stress produces conflict. This change certainly contains elements that are good, but it is often not desired and certainly never controlled. This increases the level of stress and the likelihood for conflict. Long term stress, stress that is not faced and dealt with, weakens our immune system.
    We come to church as patients infected with the disease of conflictual stress. Our “fight or flight” hormones are active and we are looking for opportunities to express our frustrations, to vent. Most churches are safe places for this venting, thought it puts a strain on all our relationships. Our churches become SAD: Stressed, Anxious and Dysfunctional, they become at risk. Fortunately, there is something we can do about it. We can move from SAD to GLAD: Good, Loving And Dynamic.
    There are Specific, Practical, Actionable Methods (SPAM) that we can use to positively manage stress, reduce conflict and strengthen our congregation’s immune system. Maintaining healthy communication is key to maintaining healthy congregations. Always talk about everything. When we have issues we feel we can’t talk about, we create barriers; when we talk about it, we create bridges.
    Communication needs to be direct, face to face. Confidentiality is good, secrets are bad. Confidentiality means those who need to know, know what they need to know, when they need to know; it is based on sharing. Secrets are about maintaining power, never a good thing in a congregation. Mutual respect and personal accountability and the willingness to give our attention to the other rather than focusing on ourselves are all key factors to maintaining a congregation’s immune system. By doing this, our congregations can become resilient rather than at-risk. We can find ways not just to survive the storm of change but to thrive in the midst of it.
    We cannot control the flow or force of the cultural change that is all around us. Yet it need not overwhelm us. We can move from SAD to GLAD with the help of SPAM! We can be resilient rather than at-risk. If you’d like to learn more, I invite you to read my book Wind and Whirlwind: Being a Pastor in a Storm of Change. Susan Nienaber, then Senior Consultant for the Alban Institute, said, “This should be required reading for all clergy early in their careers.”
    [slideshow_deploy id=’2755′]


     

  • BEYOND THE BOXES

    BEYOND THE BOXES

    By Dr. Dolly Berthelot

    ps cover for avatar“Little Boxes,” a catchy and meaningful song I’ve loved since the 1960s, echoes in my head (yep I’m that old): Little Boxes on the hillside, little boxes made of ticky tacky, little boxes on the hillside, little boxes, all the same.”

    The focus of Malvina Reynolds’s creation, which Pete Seeger popularized, was on shoddy, bland houses devouring the countryside as suburbia spread. But the sentiment applies to various boxes that we are forced into, or put ourselves into, too often limiting our work and our lives. The phrase “think outside the box” has been overused ad nauseum. However, like most clichés, there’s a reason it caught on: inherent truth.

    As a professional writer, educator, and communication consultant over varying decades, I have enjoyed the blessings of anti-boxes. My work has included newspapers, magazines, books, fiction, nonfiction; teaching 7th grade through high school and university and adults of all kinds; consulting with Fortune 500 firms and educators and physicians; editing for other writers, publishers, professors, even renowned scientists (though I understood little of their content); creating and providing seminars in human relations, unity in diversity, teamwork, “friendly persuasion,” life story and memoir writing; also, smatterings of poetry and theatrics and design and photography and art and antiques and…well, not boxes.

    As a professional writer, educator, and communication consultant over varying decades, I have enjoyed the blessings of anti-boxes.

    Boxes, and the “foolish consistency” that often accompanies them, may pay better, and certainly would provide better future retirement, but boxes can be boring. Poking out of boxes and tiptoeing cautiously off prescribed paths can be risky. We each must choose what matters most to us, what we are willing to risk.

    I have always chosen, and have thoroughly enjoyed, wandering around a more meandering path through the wild side. (Intellectually and professionally. Otherwise, not so much). I dislike, sometimes distain, the boundaries that too often limit our thinking and our creating.

    Flowers for Algernon (on which the movie “Charley” was based) is one of my favorite books ever. The imaginative little story is in the voice of a psychology research subject who starts out developmentally impaired and becomes a genius. For a time, he admires, even adulates the professors, so learned in their respective fields, often experts in their esoteric minutia. As Charley’s mind expands, however, he sees the relationships that they do not, between all knowledge, the connections, rather than simply what is within the boxes of particular disciplines and confining “areas of expertise.”

    New ideas and even new disciplines emerge from refusal to stay in the prescribed boxes.

    New ideas and even new disciplines emerge from refusal to stay in the prescribed boxes. Communication was one of those relatively new disciplines. That field, which became my field at the University of Tennessee, grew out of World War 2, with the rise of propaganda, and the need to better understand humans and systems and the myriad ways words and actions impact everything. As a then-new academic discipline, communication integrated communication aspects of all the behavioral sciences (notably psychology and sociology) plus journalism and media, later cyber technology and more.

    Most of the great work that pushes or catapults our world forward blurs boundaries, blends unexpectedly, integrates, smashes stereotypes and assumptions, leaps out of and over the boxes and may flatten them. Or use the boxes to build new things, new paradigms.

    Creativity, whatever its form or field, thrives beyond the boxes. This blog, representing the perspectives of multiple and diverse Energion authors, will deal with all kinds of creativity–understanding creativity, nourishing creativity, helping creativity flourish.


    Note: This post originally announced an appearance by Dr. Dolly, but it has enduring value. You can find more about her work via her bio page here on Energion Direct.


    Featured Image Credit: OpenClipart.org (gustavorezende)

Energion Direct
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.